Regional Conference, The Royal York Hotel, York, 18th May 2006
The speeches, presentations, voting patterns and photographs from the conference can be found below, by clicking on the appropriate link.
Speeches
Chair's Introduction
The Future Of Assessment
Chair's Closing Remarks
Workshop notes
York May 18th
Presentations
Professionalism
IEA Show York
Global Feedback
E-Assessment
Regional Conference, The Royal York Hotel, York, 18th May 2006
|
One hundred and ten assessors met with Kathleen Tattersall OBE, Chair Institute of Educational Assessors, in York for the third of the Institute's Regional Conferences on 18 May. |
|
Using state of the art voting techniques, delegates were able to give instant feedback on the issues raised by the speakers. |
|
Chair, Kathleen Tattersall, opened the conference by welcoming the assessor delegates into the "brave new world of assessment" and reminded us that "good assessment is an essential part of good teaching". |
|
Delegates were then addressed by Jacqui Smith the former minister for schools, who exhorted all teachers to join this world first institution. |
|
Graham Herbert followed with the first speaker session of the day on The future of assessment. He assured assessors that the Education Reform White Paper would cause "many changes" but stressed that the proposed new qualifications had "to be right for the learner". |
|
Andrew Bird, AQA, and David Carter followed by outlining innovations in online marking - known as e-assessment - and the impact of this new technology for assessors and learners. This was an interactive speech - Andrew asked delegates to use electronic voting consoles to tell him whether they approved of new technology in assessment. Ten seconds later we had the answer . for the answer to this question, please consult the feedback |
|
Post lunch, David Wright - representing the Institute - urged delegates to "try us out" and join - membership fees have been waived for this first year. Judith Capel (Chair of Examiners Edexcel) was one of the 87% of delegates who told the Institute they would be likely or very likely to join. |
|
Following each speaker, delegates formed into smaller groups to tease out the issues that concerned them.
|